Register  |   |   |  Calendar  |  Latest Topics
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment  
Moderator

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 3,096
Reply with quote  #1 

House File 184 - Introduced

 

 

 

                                       HOUSE FILE       

                                       BY  KAUFMANN

 

 

    Passed House,  Date               Passed Senate, Date             

    Vote:  Ayes        Nays           Vote:  Ayes        Nays         

                 Approved                            

 

                                      A BILL FOR

 

  1 An Act requiring the reporting of child custody=related

  2    information by the judicial branch.

  3 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA:

  4 TLSB 1672YH 83

  5 pf/nh/8

 

PAG LIN

 

 

 

  1  1    Section 1.  JUDICIAL BRANCH WEBSITE REPORTING OF CHILD

  1  2 CUSTODY=RELATED INFORMATION.  The judicial branch shall

  1  3 provide quarterly reports on the judicial branch internet

  1  4 website concerning child custody awards during the previous

  1  5 quarter.  The reports shall provide information regarding the

  1  6 disposition of child custody applications including the number

  1  7 of awards of joint physical custody and joint physical care,

  1  8 and the number of awards of joint physical custody and primary

  1  9 care to the mother or father.

  1 10                           EXPLANATION

  1 11    This bill directs the judicial branch to report quarterly

  1 12 on its internet website the disposition of child custody

  1 13 awards, including the number of awards of joint physical

  1 14 custody and joint physical care, and the number of awards of

  1 15 joint custody and primary care to a mother or father.

  1 16 LSB 1672YH 83

  1 17 pf/nh/8


__________________
IowaFathers
P.O. Box 2884
Waterloo, IA 50704-2884
support@IowaFathers.com
Website: http://www.IowaFathers.com
Visit us on facebook under Groups: Iowa Fathers



"Political reasons have not the requisite certainty to afford juridical interpretation. They are different in different men. They are different in the same men at different times. And when a strict interpretation of the Constitution, according to the fixed rules which govern the interpretation of laws, is abandoned, and the theoretical opinions of individuals are allowed to control its meaning, we have no longer a Constitution; we are under a government of individual men, who for the time being have the power to declare what the Constitution is, according to their own views of that it ought to mean." Dred Scott v.Sanford, 19 How. 393, 620 (1857) (Curtis, J., dissenting).
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Quick Navigation:


Create your own forum with Website Toolbox!