Registered: 1173223837 Posts: 907
Reply with quote #1
House File 2467 - Introduced HOUSE FILE BY KAUFMANN and SCHUELLER Passed House, Date Passed Senate, Date Vote: Ayes Nays Vote: Ayes Nays Approved A BILL FOR 1 An Act relating to the holding of a parent in contempt regarding 2 the denial of child visitation and making a penalty 3 applicable. 4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA: 5 TLSB 5548HH 82 6 pf/nh/8 PAG LIN 1 1 Section 1. Section 598.23, subsection 1, Code Supplement 1 2 2007, is amended to read as follows: 1 3 1. If a person against whom a temporary order or final 1 4 decree has been entered willfully disobeys the order or 1 5 decree, the person may be cited and punished by the court for 1 6 contempt and be committed to the county jail for a period of 1 7 time not to exceed thirty days for each offense. The court 1 8 may find that a person willfully disobeyed the order or decree 1 9 and hold the person in contempt if the person is found to have 1 10 unilaterally decided to deny visitation, as prescribed by the 1 11 order or decree, in response to a non=life=threatening 1 12 emergency. 1 13 EXPLANATION 1 14 This bill provides that one basis for a finding of contempt 1 15 under the dissolution of marriage and domestic relations Code 1 16 chapter is that a person willfully disobeyed an order or 1 17 decree by unilaterally deciding to deny visitation, as 1 18 prescribed by the order or decree, in response to a 1 19 non=life=threatening emergency. The punishment for contempt 1 20 is commitment to the county jail for a period not to exceed 30 1 21 days for each offense, or an alternative penalty specified in 1 22 the section. 1 23 LSB 5548HH 82 1 24 pf/nh/8 __________________ Eric E. Durnan
I don't see the glass as being half full or half empty. I see the glass as being twice as large as it needs to be.
Registered: 1078687818 Posts: 3,096
Reply with quote #2
HF 2467 and HF 2468 were the two bills that we had the legislative meeting earlier this year in CR about.
P.O. Box 2884
Waterloo, IA 50704-2884
Visit us on facebook under Groups: Iowa Fathers
"Political reasons have not the requisite certainty to afford juridical interpretation. They are different in different men. They are different in the same men at different times. And when a strict interpretation of the Constitution, according to the fixed rules which govern the interpretation of laws, is abandoned, and the theoretical opinions of individuals are allowed to control its meaning, we have no longer a Constitution; we are under a government of individual men, who for the time being have the power to declare what the Constitution is, according to their own views of that it ought to mean." Dred Scott v.Sanford, 19 How. 393, 620 (1857) (Curtis, J., dissenting).